Liberal Women Paint The Killing Of Unborn Children With “Flowery” Buzzwords
Abortion, in America, is nearing its bloody end. A bold statement perhaps, but liberals, and liberal feminists, are all too aware of what is going on in America, the political climate circulating around abortion and their inability to get around the fact that abortion is, always has been, and always will be – the killing of an unborn child. But that does not stop them from trying.
Abortion won’t end tomorrow, nor will it end immediately after Romney is sworn in as President. But Americans are more pro-life (a term dreaded and despised by liberals) than they have ever been, and that trend will continue to grow. To counter this shift, to delay it, to turn it back to the pro-abortion side, a new marketing scheme is underway to make you think that abortion is really all about “women’s health planning”.
Arianna Nation SS contributors, Vicky Kuperman and Erica Grossman write:
It’s [abortion] all about political “framing,” a term that is familiar to anyone who has even occasionally channel-surfed through C-SPAN. In the case of women’s rights, conservatives have historically excelled at cloaking their various agendas — primarily, their fierce opposition to abortion — in either sunny, feel-good terms (“pro-life” as opposed to “anti-abortion,” for example) or in graphic and shocking terms (“partial-birth abortion” as opposed to “late-term abortion”). In the end, these emotionalized buzzwords have enabled them to perfect a kind of moral hijacking, hitting their base in the gut, and rallying them through anger and fear.
Why would pro-abortion advocates have to go to such lengths to disguise abortion if a majority in America are pro-abortion? We can clearly see how much Vicky and Erica disdain life in their mockery of the term “pro-life”, and how much they are in denial over the definition of “partial-birth abortion”. Partial birth abortion is an exact term. In other words, it describes exactly what is happening – the child is partially born (removed from the womb), but because its head is too large to fit comfortably through the birth canal, the doctor plunges a long, sharp probe into its skull and begins sucking out the brain and fluids, which deflates the head and makes for an easier passage. That is what Vicky, Erica and every other damned, contemptible supporter of this procedure don’t want you to actually know or understand. Hence, they “flower” the term and make it smell better to the unwary, the uneducated, the unknowing and unsuspecting people they have been able to brainwash. “Late term abortion” they dub it. Because most people who support abortion don’t actually know what abortion is, calling partial birth abortion simply a “late-term abortion” will not register with these people.
Liberals will indeed need a better marketing strategy if they want to continue brainwashing people into support the killing of unborn children. What is ironic is, the more they attempt to distract and disguise what abortion really is with “flowery” rhetoric, speech, and buzzwords, the more they actually expose themselves and their agenda and how shady, how corrupt, how disingenuous they, and abortion, really is.
And if they think they can mask the killing of unborn children by calling it “women’s health planning”, this will be another surefire disaster for them. They – liberals and liberal pro-abortion feminists – are engaged in a cover-up. They are guilty of doing to, and for, abortion exactly what was being done for decades by the Catholic hierarchy with their pedophile priests in that each of the two realities – abortion and pedophilia – were covered-up and disguised. And just as abortion was re-branded and re-marketed, so too were the priests, who were moved from one parish to another, thereby creating a new and “clean” slate. But the truth still lurked underneath the “flowery” revision of priest pedophilia just as much as the truth still lurks underneath the “flowery” renaming of abortion as “women’s health planning”. A pedophile priest is still a pedophile priest; that he has been moved to another parish does not change that. Abortion is still abortion; that it is called something else does not change that.
Of “women’s health planning”, Vicky and Erica say:
These words not only have the benefit of sounding neutral and caring, but they also checkmate conservatives from mounting a counterattack. After all, it’s hard to imagine Mitt Romney railing against a woman’s health and walking away from the podium intact.
Of course they could not be more deluded and more blinded by reality. The “counterattack” has already been “mounted”, their agenda has been exposed as shallow and hollow, and they have been shown to be the frauds they are. Conservatives can very easily promote women’s health without promoting the killing of unborn children.
Or – do Vicky and Erica, do all liberals, and pro-abortion liberal feminists, really believe that abortion, and having an abortion, promotes women’s health, and makes women healthier for having had one? If they do, why aren’t they advocating that every woman have at least one abortion in their lifetime? Mitt Romney is advocating against abortion in his Presidential bid. Why isn’t Obama advocating for abortion in his reelection bid?
Related articles
- Pro-Life Women Are Watching Also, Cecile Richards (neosecularist.com)
- Brainwashed Teenager Argues for Right To Kill Unborn Children (neosecularist.com)
- Abortion Is An Emotional Choice Not A Rational Choice (neosecularist.com)
- Of Michelle Goldberg Part 9: To Her, A “Wrongful Birth” Means One Less Abortion (neosecularist.com)
- Abortion Not (Just) A Religious Issue – It’s Terry O’Neill Who Is “Poppycock” (neosecularist.com)
- How To Challenge Obama, All Pro-Abortion Politicians, Expose Their Hypocrisy – And Ruin Their Political Careers (neosecularist.com)
- A Fluke-y Problem (theamericanchroniclesaculturalreview.wordpress.com)