The Arianna Nation is brushing off the Hilary Rosen “war on women” remarks as nothing, while at the same time accusing conservatives of attacking Rosen because she is a lesbian. Which is it? The Arianna Nation is trying to have it both ways, saying that Rosen’s remarks were not worth the time everyone has invested talking about it. But because Rosen is a lesbian, the Arianna Nation has found something it could latch onto it could not – it would not – have if Rosen was not a lesbian. In other words, the Arianna Nation is using Rosen, and her being a lesbian, as a weapon to attack conservatives. How does that make gays and lesbians feel?
Barely anywhere is anyone talking about Rosen’s homosexuality, so why invoke it? Conservatives are outraged that Rosen has insulted both Ann Romney and all women who make the decision to stay at home and raise a family. We could care less that Rosen is a lesbian. This is how the Arianna Nation really feels about homosexuals – using them, degrading them, putting them in the middle of the so-called “war on women”. Gays and lesbians are being used as props in the Arianna Nation’s war on conservatives and Republicans. It is the Arianna Nation which is willing throw gays and lesbians under the bus to further their own liberal agenda, and somehow gays and lesbians are supposed to feel proud of supporting this online publication?
Apparently American women are being attacked and maligned after-all. We had all thought this “war on women” was phony and doctored-up by the Democrat Party in a vain attempt to distract voters from the dismal and pathetic record of Barack Obama. We thought this whole “war on women” spiel was nothing more than a gimmick to damage Republicans and help elect more Democrats. ladies and gentlemen – it has now been confirmed, and it is now been made official – there really is a war on women being waged right here in America. A vicious, savage, despicable, hateful war. Women really are in serious danger, right here in America. But, as it turns out, women have nothing whatsoever to fear from Republicans. Rather, women have everything to fear from – Democrats. Democrats have declared a war on women, and the values that women still hold dear in America, despite the Left’s brutal attempts over the decades to paint women, conservative women, as traitors, and belittle those women who value family, and raising their children over selfishly throwing their kids under the bus for a career of their own. Mind you, it is still a phony “war on women”, but who could have really expected it was actually the Democrats, all along, who have been waging and coordinating this “war on women”?
This is the video that started the “War On Women”…
So, according to Hilary Rosen, women are “old fashioned” who make the decision to stay at home and raise their children, instead of leaving them in the care of a “nanny” or babysitter while they pursue a working career. While it is more true than false that Democrat and liberal women value a career more than they value family and raising children, because America as a whole does not yet see it that way, there is still a level of damage control needed to be done by Obama’s campaign staff. This is why David Axelrod took to Twitter and issued this response:
Also Disappointed in Hilary Rosen’s comments about Ann Romney. They were inappropriate and offensive.
In other words, Axelrod, and others in Obama’s circle are beginning a mini war on Hilary Rosen herself. Remember, Obama is not above throwing anyone in his camp under the bus that might cause him or his reelection campaign damage or create a negative influence on his faux prestige.
And recall that Hilary Rosen was not the only women to complain and criticize about stay at home moms:
It is a long established fact that liberal women hate family, hate the idea of raising their own children, hate the idea of being a stay at home mom and hate the idea of being labeled as a “homemaker”. Liberal women are the real instigators of the “war on women”, going back all the way to the early 1900’s. Margaret Sanger might very well have been the woman who started the “war on women”. In any event, if we are to conclude that a real “war on women” is being waged in America, who do we rightfully put the blame on for having started it? Conservatives and conservative women, as Hilary Rosen, Hillary Clinton and all liberal women suggest, and for which the Democrat Party, including its cheer-leader, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, have been propagandizing?
Not all women have bought into this phony war. In fact, most American women are perfectly satisfied with committing more energy to their family, and raising their children. than Democrats have ever given them credit for.
And it is a sure bet liberal women, and Democrats, male and female alike, will lose even more support now as their anti-women, anti-family position becomes clearer to the American public. Obama has no choice but to throw Rosen under the bus to help save face, and to help save his reelection bid. Even Obama knows that “homemakers” far out number, and are far more powerful a voting block than women who have abandoned their families for their own selfish and self-interest gains. But, is it too late for Obama to rectify and reposition himself as a “family-friendly” President? Has Obama ever been a “family-friendly” President to begin with? Has Obama ever been a “woman-friendly” President?
David Axelrod 
The Neosecularist 